Blog

It’s time for the EFF to talk out on the Tornado Cash scenario. The OFAC sanctioning a wise contract may’ve been going too far, they stepped into the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s turf. We may summarize the EFF’s case with this sentence: “for decades, U.S. courts have recognized that code is speech.” It’s so simple as that, however the authorities and the Office of Foreign Assets Control don’t see it that manner. In the Netherlands, they even arrested an alleged Tornado Cash developer. 

Before we get into the EFF’s arguments, it’s best to know that “the Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world.” The group was based in 1990, and its “mission is to ensure that technology supports freedom, justice, and innovation for all people of the world.” In the weblog put up titled “Code, Speech, and the Tornado Cash Mixer” the group presents the authorized case in a transparent and concise manner. We’ll attempt to simplify it much more, however when you converse legalese think about studying the unique put up.

The EFF begins like this:  

“The U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)’s placement of “Tornado Cash” as an entity on the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) sanction record raises essential questions which are being mentioned world wide.”

We compiled a few of these questions in our Crypto Reacts regular feature, and now it’s time for the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s formal strategy.

BTC worth chart for 08/23/2022 on Bitfinex | Source: BTC/USD on TradingView.com

The EFF Asks: What Is Tornado Cash Exactly?

To summarize, OFAC included mixing service Tornado Cash within the SDN record. This is a critical measure, “once an entity is on the sanctions list, U.S. persons and businesses must stop “dealing” with them, together with by way of transfers of cash or property.” However, Tornado Cash shouldn’t be an entity. It’s open-source software program. Still, all US-based organizations that had some publicity to Tornado Cash dropped everything related to it like a sizzling potato.

“The issues EFF is most concerned about arise from speech protections for software code and how they relate to government attempts to stop illegal activity using this code.”

Besides the truth that software program deployed within the Ethereum blockchain will probably be there without end, it doesn’t matter what, there’s one other downside. According to the EFF, “the OFAC listing is ambiguous” and “Tornado Cash” may confer with a number of various things, creating ambiguity in what precisely is sanctioned.” The “several different things” Tornado Cash may confer with are:

• “Tornado Cash “Classic” 
• “Tornado Cash “Nova” 
• “The underlying open source project that developed and published the code on GitHub”
• “The name of this autonomous mixer software that resides as a smart contract (application) running on the Ethereum network”
• “The URL of the tornado.cash website”
• “And could be considered a name of an entity consisting of some set of people involved with the mixer.”

Is the OFAC sanctioning the whole lot on that record?

The Professor The EFF Is Representing

At the center of the pertinent questions, there’s an precise authorized case:

“In keeping with our longstanding defense of the right to publish code, we are representing Professor Matthew Green, who teaches computer science at the Johns Hopkins Information Security Institute, including applied cryptography and anonymous cryptocurrencies.”

I’ve labored with this code as a researcher and I exploit it to show my courses, so it’s essential to me that it stays easily-accessible on a significant web site like GitHub. (This shouldn’t be the one copy, in truth it’s a fork of another person’s.)

— Matthew Green (@matthew_d_green) August 22, 2022

Professor Matthew Green “made a Github organization to republish a fork of the Tornado Cash repositories that were banned following the Treasury’s sanction order the other week.” His reasoning for doing so is that this: “I’ve worked with this code as a researcher and I use it to teach my classes, so it’s important to me that it stays easily-accessible on a major site like GitHub.”

According to the EFF, “The First Amendment protects both GitHub’s right to host that code, and Professor Green’s right to publish (here republish) it on GitHub so he and others can use it for teaching, for further study, and for development of the technology.” Do they’ve a case? It actually feels that manner. And some readability across the Tornado Cash sanctions wouldn’t damage, both.

Featured Image: Free speech icon from the EFF's website | Charts by TradingView