Blog

• Binance CEO CZ introduced the change is dumping their FTT holdings following revelations concerning the Alameda/FTX relationship
• Alameda’s $14.6 billion of belongings are 40% FTT, FTX’s native token
• There is minimal details about how Alameda’s $8 billion of liabilities are denominated
• Bankman-Fried foilliquidity Alameda and FTX however has defended the battle of curiosity
• Volume of FTT is low – the illiquidity would forestall Alameda selling their FTT
• Alameda has supplied to purchase CZ’s FTT at $22 per token, as concern mounts that selling strain will tank market
• CZ says it’ll take months to promote
• My query is why is crypto going by way of this once more?
• We stay in a blockchain world, how troublesome is it to place all this on a blockchain?

Not once more.

With PTSD from the contagion of the summer time nonetheless distinguished for crypto traders, when seemingly half the business went poof, it’s now feeling like déjà vu. And who to play the villain function this time spherical, however solely FTX, the supposed white knight who had stepped in to save lots of the day with last-minute bailout affords of corporations Celsius and BlockFi.

What occurred?

Back within the day – and in crypto phrases, which means solely a few years in the past – Binance helped incubate FTX, who right this moment current as their greatest competitor.

They exited the fairness place final yr, receiving $2.1 billion for his or her tidy funding. But this wasn’t paid in money, as an alternative they acquired the fee break up between the stablecoin BUSD and, crucially, FTX’s native token,  FTT.

The hassle is centred on the fee taken within the FTT token. CZ, Binance’s CEO, introduced on Twitter that “due to recent revelations that have come to light, we have decided to liquidate any remaining FTT on our books”.

He added that “we will try do so in a way that minimises market impact. Due to market conditions and limited liquidity, we expect this will take a few months to complete”.

As a part of Binance’s exit from FTX fairness final yr, Binance acquired roughly $2.1 billion USD equal in money (BUSD and FTT). Due to latest revelations which have got here to mild, we’ve got determined to liquidate any remaining FTT on our books. 1/4

— CZ 🔶 Binance (@cz_binance) November 6, 2022

What are the revelations about FTX?

CZ’s announcement is in response to a CoinDesk story about buying and selling agency Alameda Research’s steadiness sheet.

Alameda is (type of) a sister firm of FTX, though the main points are a bit murkier. The hedge fund/buying and selling agency was based by Sam Bankman-Fried, the identical Sam who heads up FTX, who has lengthy confronted questions concerning the battle of curiosity between these two corporations.

Exchanges stay and die by their liquidity, and it is the toughest factor to realize when launching a brand new change. Traders will observe liquidity, however if you begin with zero liquidity, you don’t get merchants. And by definition, liquidity solely comes from merchants. So, it’s type of like a perverse rooster and egg drawback.

Bankman-Fried solved this chicken-and-egg drawback by funnelling a load of Alameda’s trades by way of FTX, therefore bootstrapping up the liquidity. Soon, FTX was off to the races, its progress phenomenal (launched solely three years in the past, with Bankman-Fried catapulted into the billionaire membership in his twenties).

The questions surrounding a battle of curiosity centre round what data Alameda sees in the marketplace that common merchants don’t. Bankman-Fried has pushed again on this, however the actuality is that Alameda is one of many greatest liquidity suppliers on the change and actively buying and selling in opposition to prospects. Assuming it is all sincere, the battle of curiosity is nonetheless simple to see.

Alameda is a liquidity supplier on FTX however their account is identical to everybody else’s. Alameda’s incentive is only for FTX to do in addition to potential; by far the dominant issue is serving to to make the buying and selling expertise nearly as good as potential.

— SBF (@SBF_FTX) July 31, 2019

But there are different tangled storylines between the 2. While they “are two separate businesses”, CoinDesk reported that “the division breaks down in a key place: on Alameda’s balance sheet, according to a private financial document reviewed by CoinDesk”.

Alameda’s belongings summed to $14.6 billion on June 30^th, of which $3.66 billion was “unlocked FTT” and $2.16 billion of “FTT collateral”. I charted the asset breakdown beneath, which features a heavy dose of Solana, the cryptocurrency that Sam Bankman-Fried was an early investor in and stays a vocal supporter.

Obviously, that is a reasonably regarding steadiness sheet of intensely correlated devices. But it’s actually the FTT token that stands out, occupying a staggering 40% (between locked and unlocked allocations). FTT is, in spite of everything, a token created by FTX.

How regarding is the FTX token?

It’s not simply the incestuous ties between the corporate, nor the truth that FTX was printed out of skinny air and is now occupying 40% of the steadiness sheet. Because there is a liquidity drawback right here, too.

As I write this, the market cap of FTT token is $3 billion (based on CoinMarketCap)  and the totally diluted market cap is $7.9 billion. And now you see the issue – Alameda holds $3.7 billion of that market cap, alongside one other $2.2 billion in “FTT collateral” – for which your concept is nearly as good as mine as a result of I haven’t a clue what which means.

Other belongings talked about within the CoinDesk report don’t quell the priority both. SRM is one, which is the native token of the Serum decentralised change based by, you guessed it, Sam Bankman-Fried.

There are three different tokens talked about – MAPS, OXY and FIDA. I gained’t faux I do know a lot about these, however that in itself sums up the issue. Again, these are extremely illiquid – much more so than FTT.

And so, the large query factors in the direction of liabilities. FTX have liabilities on their steadiness sheet totalling $8 billion, of which $7.4 billion are loans.  I couldn’t monitor down any extra data on them, however there is little question that this determine presents as worrying when in comparison with the illiquid asset facet analysed above.

It needs to be talked about that FTT is talked about among the many liabilities. This would soften the worry significantly, as the identical challenge of “phantom” belongings may then apply to the liabilities facet.

But we do not know what the majority of the liabilities is denominated in. While I don’t suppose for one second that Alameda may very well be bancrupt, the doomsday situation is a legal responsibility facet stuffed with fiat, because the asset facet merely can’t be liquidated en masse to fulfill liabilities. Arguably, it is erroneously overstated given the ties to FTX  and the truth that FTT might be printed out of skinny air and has such low liquidity.

That chart says all of it. Daily quantity during the last 6 months averages $25 million, earlier than the ramp-up this week as this story has begun to get airtime. There is fairly merely no method that Alameda can liquidate a significant chunk of its FTT holdings with out tanking the market worth. Therefore, its belongings on paper vastly overegg what they’re price in actual life.

So what occurs when Binance promote?

So, CZ is spooked by the revelations across the FTT token. A perceived lack of underlying worth is one factor, however creating it out of skinny air and utilizing it to prop up steadiness sheets is one other. So in comes the promote order.

Interestingly, CZ gave the cryptic tweet that “we won’t support people who lobby against other industry players behind their backs”, suggesting there is extra to it than issues concerning the Alameda /FTX relationship.

Liquidating our FTT is simply post-exit threat administration, studying from LUNA. We gave help earlier than, however we cannot faux to make love after divorce. We usually are not in opposition to anybody. But we cannot help individuals who foyer in opposition to different business gamers behind their backs. Onwards.

— CZ 🔶 Binance (@cz_binance) November 6, 2022

And whereas we don’t know what quantity of Binance’s $2.1 billion fairness payout from FTX is denominated in BUSD and FTT, there is little question it is substantial in comparison with the liquidity buying and selling in the marketplace – with $500 million the rumoured whole.

This is why Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison waded in with a proposal to purchase CZ’s whole bag of FTT at a worth of $22 per token. At time of writing, the market worth is $22.20. CZ had acknowledged the liquidity scenario by s https://twitter.com/carolinecapital/status/1589287457975304193ating it could take plenty of months to finish the promote order.

@cz_binance when you’re seeking to reduce the market impression in your FTT gross sales, Alameda will fortunately purchase all of it from you right this moment at $22!

— Caroline (@carolinecapital) November 6, 2022

She additionally had earlier moved to make clear that the steadiness sheet referenced within the CoinDesk report was incomplete, though this didn’t dissuade CZ from selling.

My ideas

As is commonplace right here, there is a irritating lack of readability right here.

Ellison’s feedback that the steadiness sheet is incomplete present this. But let me ask this – in an business constructed on the blockchain, why is there so typically an issue with transparency? Why can’t we’ve got these large gamers current their holdings and steadiness sheets on-chain for all to see?

We noticed the identical throughout the Terra fiasco, with no one sure of what capital the Luna Foundation Guard held, who had been deploying Bitcoin desperately to defend the collapsing peg.

And once more – additionally déjà vu right here – the entire thing is extra incestuous than a Lannister household gathering. Alameda holding FTT tokens, launched by FTX, which was invested in by Binance, who received paid out in FTT. From the skin wanting in, this is insanity.

It was the identical with Three Arrows Capital holding Luna. And BlockFi had publicity, too. And then Celsius and Voyager Digital. And the checklist goes on. They all had publicity to one another, Terra and a tanking Bitcoin – a nasty downward spiral that fell like a home of playing cards.  

I don’t suppose this is the case right here. FTX appear OK and I imagine Alameda do have their geese in a row. But the data above is regarding, and it’s ridiculous that I even have to take a position on this within the first place. Not to say the tangled hyperlink between the 2 is unhealthy for all concerned.

This is only a guess. Of course, we’ve got no data on the legal responsibility facet of Alameda’s steadiness sheet. If it is $8 billion of fiat, then there may very well be an issue. But once more, we don’t know.

This is crypto, so why can’t we simply stick it on the blockchain and cease having to opine about it on the Internet? We have seen this film too many occasions and it’s getting tiring.